[opendmarc-users] DMARC-safe list, was Re: SPF pass with alignment, yet DMARC fail?

[Adam Lanier]

Yes, why not take advantage of whatever CURRENT options exist to coexist with dkim/dmarc?

Mailman can easily be upgraded to the latest version, right?




-----Original Message-----
From: opendmarc-users-bounces at trusteddomain.org [mailto:opendmarc-users-bounces at trusteddomain.org] On Behalf Of Steven M Jones
Sent: Thursday, October 6, 2016 4:40 PM
To: opendmarc-users at trusteddomain.org
Subject: [opendmarc-users] DMARC-safe list, was Re: SPF pass with alignment, yet DMARC fail?

On 10/06/16 02:40, Thomas Sturm wrote:
>
>> PS: Even though this is a mailing list about DMARC, it is not DMARC save,
>> so most members running some kind of DMARC check (e.g. OpenDMARC) will
>> reject messages from you because of your DMARC policy of 'reject'…
> Kind of ironic ;)

For what it's worth, I believe this list pre-dates the DMARC "p=reject"
workarounds appearing in Mailman. But even if the installed version had
them (I don't think it does), you'd have to change how the list works in
a fairly intrusive way (by for example having the list address in the
5322.From address field).

People usually get pretty cranky when things like that suddenly change,
but this has come up several times before. Are the people on this list
willing to accept that disruption (if it was an option)?

--S.

_______________________________________________
opendmarc-users mailing list
opendmarc-users at trusteddomain.org
http://www.trusteddomain.org/mailman/listinfo/opendmarc-users