[opendmarc-users] DMARC-safe list, was Re: SPF pass with alignment, yet DMARC fail?

[Juri Haberland]

On 06.10.2016 22:39, Steven M Jones wrote:
> On 10/06/16 02:40, Thomas Sturm wrote:
>>
>>> PS: Even though this is a mailing list about DMARC, it is not DMARC save,
>>> so most members running some kind of DMARC check (e.g. OpenDMARC) will
>>> reject messages from you because of your DMARC policy of 'reject'…
>> Kind of ironic ;)
> 
> For what it's worth, I believe this list pre-dates the DMARC "p=reject"
> workarounds appearing in Mailman. But even if the installed version had
> them (I don't think it does), you'd have to change how the list works in
> a fairly intrusive way (by for example having the list address in the
> 5322.From address field).
> 
> People usually get pretty cranky when things like that suddenly change,
> but this has come up several times before. Are the people on this list
> willing to accept that disruption (if it was an option)?

What about turning of rewriting the subject (aka adding "[listname] ") and
stop adding the footer? That would work with even an ancient Mailman
versions and should make DKIM pass again.
IMHO takeing ownership of the mail is worse than just dropping those additions.

  Juri