[opendmarc-users] Patch Comparison and Personal RFC

[Steve Jenkins]

On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:42 PM, Scott Kitterman <sklist at kitterman.com>
wrote:

>
> So here's the differences:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/159/
>
> I didn't include it because I didn't have the time to study it.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/168/
>
> I included this one, but in retrospect, probably shouldn't have.  It's a
> new
> feature and I generally don't think we should be distro patching those
> in.  I
> don't plan to drop it, since I've shipped it, but I don't particularly
> recommend you add it.
>
> Not sure what I was thinking at the time.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/171/
>
> Seemed low priority, but probably worthwhile including. The only concern
> is if
> later msk decides to change the code to match the docs rather than change
> the
> docs to match the code.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/193/
>
> I think I missed this one by accident.
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/opendmarc/tickets/197/
>
> This one I left alone since there's no telling which of the two msk will
> keep.
> I thought it better to have two than to remove one and have it change
> later.
>

Thanks, Scott. Lemme chew on all of that before I make a final decision.

SteveJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.trusteddomain.org/pipermail/opendmarc-users/attachments/20161212/d4097e0c/attachment.htm>