[opendmarc-users] Feedback on Reported Issue

[Steve Jenkins]

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Scott Kitterman <sklist at kitterman.com>
wrote:

> Opendmarc has its own internal SPF checking code that is used when
> compiled --
> with-spf, but not linked against libspf2.  The internal code is by no
> means a
> complete implementation of the SPF spec.  My kvetching about that is (I
> think)
> why linking against libspf2 is an option.
>
> It's not required to use libspf2 (btw, libspf is a completely separate
> ancient, abandoned code base, so to be clear, it's libspf2 you want), but I
> certainly recommend it.  That's what I did in the Debian packages.


Thanks, Scott. I would gladly include it in the package, but libspf2 isn't
currently available in the Fedora repos. In fact, it seems that the
justification is that it's not needed since OpenDMARC does it internally
(see comment #6):

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1057874

Can you help me provide a compelling reason on that bug (even though it
will be a necropost on my part) to convince them that it is worth including?

Thanks,

SteveJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.trusteddomain.org/pipermail/opendmarc-users/attachments/20150401/0336dde8/attachment.htm>