[opendmarc-users] Does my opendmarc 1.3.2 parse domains correctly?

[Juri Haberland]

Dominic Raferd wrote:

> Thanks Juri. It's not so much the absence of sp= (although that would be
> nice to have appearing as well) it's that google shows 'header.from=emv5.com'
> which is actually the domain that was/should_have_been tested (because
> there is no DMARC TXT record for skimium.emv5.com) whereas openDMARC shows '
>
> header.from=skimium.emv5.com' so you don't know that openDMARC *actually*
> looked at the DMARC TXT record for emv5.com (as it did, if I understand you
> correctly).

Ok, but still I think Google is wrong here and OpenDMARC is right - at least,
if my interpretation of the RFC is right. There is nothing written, that the
actually tested domain should be reported in the header.from field.

What OpenDMARC actually tested should be recorded in the history file, which
will be imported into the database.

  Juri