[opendmarc-users] opendmarc 1.3.2~Beta1-2 milter failure

[Juri Haberland]

On 2017-01-19 09:28, Dominic Raferd wrote:

> My bad. When I look at the actual email I see opendmarc's header
> includes: 'dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none)'. So the sender has a 'none'
> policy, this is why the email was sent onward and not rejected or put
> into the hold queue. I presume 'dis' in the header means 'action taken
> by opendmarc'?

dis = disposition

> So I think opendmarc 1.3.2~Beta1-2 is working fine. Might be better if
> more information was logged (i.e. the same info as appears in the
> email header, so that the context of a 'fail' could be seen from the
> log).

Good suggestion - you might want to open a ticket so that this won't get 
lost.


   Juri