[opendmarc-users] DMARC-safe list, was Re: SPF pass with alignment, yet DMARC fail?

[Benny Pedersen]

On 2016-10-06 22:39, Steven M Jones wrote:

> For what it's worth, I believe this list pre-dates the DMARC "p=reject"
> workarounds appearing in Mailman. But even if the installed version had
> them (I don't think it does), you'd have to change how the list works 
> in
> a fairly intrusive way (by for example having the list address in the
> 5322.From address field).

what is the point of dkim/dmarc forged mails with unprotected dnssec ?, 
in my book its like go over watar to get water

> People usually get pretty cranky when things like that suddenly change,
> but this has come up several times before. Are the people on this list
> willing to accept that disruption (if it was an option)?

people could aswell drop dkim/dmarc, it would be effitive better

so we all end with spf that works everywhere, sadly

trusteddomain.org is a joke