[opendmarc-users] Patch Comparison and Personal RFC

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 19:56 -0800, Steve Jenkins wrote:
> Scott, Juri, and anyone else who feels like chiming in (I'm looking at you,
> Andreas):
> 
> I've built this simple spreadsheet showing the patches that each of you
> suggests including in an opendmarc build that you consider "worthy" of
> pushing to stable repos , even though it's built using beta source:
> 
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1bhlYp_A6j_NF6I9cEAoHsYJV06ooEjkDlsMo9v67mtQ/edit?usp=sharing
> 
> As you can see, for the most part, both agree on the majority of the
> patches.
> 
> But before I make a final decision regarding which patches I believe should
> appear in a Fedora/RHEL build, I'd like to hear comments about:
> 
> - why you chose to include a patch that the other one didn't, and
> - why you chose not to include a patch that the other one did
> 
> As well as any thoughts you think I should consider.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> SteveJ
> 
> P.S. Yes, I'm aware that awilliam (whom I've cc'd)  has recently built and
> pushed a new Fedora build, but I'm trying to be as informed as I can about
> the patches being included, which is why I'm hoping for this discussion.

I just went with all the patches Juri listed as 'needed', on the basis
that it's almost impossible for that to make things any worse than the
bare beta0 build you did (or the one I did with a fix for just one
crash).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net