[opendmarc-users] [dmarc-discuss] who is wrong: google or opendmarc?
Franck Martin
fmartin at linkedin.com
Wed Jul 24 12:55:27 PDT 2013
I concur
I thought it was the strict alignment which was a problem, but as service3.zalando-lounge.de<http://service3.zalando-lounge.de> has a dmarc record and not zalando-lounge.de<http://zalando-lounge.de> then the From: would have been @service3.zalando-lounge.de<http://service3.zalando-lounge.de> therefore the strict alignment and DKIM pass would have been enough to do a DMARC pass.
https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-inspector/service3.zalando-lounge.de
So the opendmarc implementation has a config bug likely.
On Jul 24, 2013, at 9:38 AM, Olga Gavrylyako <olgag at google.com<mailto:olgag at google.com>> wrote:
Hi Andreas,
for DMARC we require either SPF or DKIM to pass. In your example DKIM passes.
Olga
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:14 AM, Andreas Schulze <sca at andreasschulze.de<mailto:sca at andreasschulze.de>> wrote:
Zitat von Andreas Schulze <sca at andreasschulze.de>:
Authentication-Results: mta.example.org;
dmarc=fail header.from=service3.zalando-lounge.de
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; ...
dmarc=pass (p=REJECT dis=NONE) d=service3.zalando-lounge.de
Hello,
I still noticed no response at all...
* same sender
* dmarc=pass @ google
* dmarc=fail @ opendmarc
Maybe a googler could tell something.
Thanks
Andreas
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
_______________________________________________
dmarc-discuss mailing list
dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org<mailto:dmarc-discuss at dmarc.org>
http://www.dmarc.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc-discuss
NOTE: Participating in this list means you agree to the DMARC Note Well terms (http://www.dmarc.org/note_well.html)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.trusteddomain.org/pipermail/opendmarc-users/attachments/20130724/1ef9819e/attachment.htm>
More information about the opendmarc-users
mailing list