[opendmarc-dev] draft: patch to implement an override mechanism for MLMs

[Scott Kitterman]

On Thursday, May 26, 2016 12:20:22 PM Juri Haberland wrote:
> A. Schulze wrote:
> > It enable us to theoretical add the Delivery-Result to failure reports.
> > 
> > These reports use field defined by
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6591#section-3.1
> > 
> > then a Delivery-Result defined by
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6591#section-3.2.2 could be added.
> 
> The values defined in section 3.2.2 are:
> "delivered" / "spam" / "policy" / "reject" / "other"
> 
> Shall we map like this:
> NONE      -> delivered
> QURANTINE -> policy
> REJECT    -> reject
> 
> Or do we use "adisposition" verbatim?
> 
> Unfortunately RFC 6591 is not updated to support DMARC...

RFC 6591 doesn't need updating directly as the DMARC RFC itself contains the 
new information needed to generate AR header fields for DMARC.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7489#page-42

Since this is a failure report, why isn't the Delivery-Result always reject?  

Delivery-Result is for the delivery result, not the result of DMARC 
processing.  The result of DMARC goes in the AR field.

Scott K