[opendmarc-dev] 1.3.2 Beta Status?

[Juri Haberland]

On 2016-08-03 23:52, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 03, 2016 08:44:16 AM Steve Jenkins wrote:

>> 1.3.2 seems to be stable and working great (with those two patches) on 
>> the
>> distros I monitor. Any updates on its status? As I recall, this was
>> intended to be a very short beta period.
> 
> I've put it in Debian Experimental and no complaints so far.
> 
> As I mentioned earlier, it'd be nice to see tickets 153, 166, and 168
> addressed as well as the docs patch I mailed separately.

Can we have a discussion about ticket #153 - I think it's invalid. As I 
wrote in a mail last week:

> I think this one ("duplicate dkim auth_result sections") is invalid. In 
> my
> reading of the RFC it is valid to include multiple dkim auth_result
> sections, if there are multiple Authentication-Result: dkim 
> headers/DKIM
> signatures.
> 
> See also the discussion on the dmarc-discuss ML, e.g.
> http://lists.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2016-July/003549.html
> 
> The main point is that the RFC is not clear what to report:
> all DKIM results, only the one used for the decission or any other
> combination - everything would be valid.
> 
> Me personally, I like to report all DKIM results found in the mail, 
> because
> if you report only one - and you have multiple DKIM results, but none
> matches DMARC-wise, which result do you report in this case?


   Juri