[opendmarc-dev] [dmarc-discuss] DMARC On AmazonSES
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at blackops.org
Wed Jul 31 00:27:33 PDT 2013
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> to me that sounds like opendmarc has currently a bug.
>
> -> http://www.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2013-July/002048.html
> -> http://www.dmarc.org/pipermail/dmarc-discuss/2013-July/002057.html
>
> I get mails that pass spf and dkim.
> dkim is alligned, spf not. That should be enougth to pass dmarc but opendmarc
> let the message fail.
>
> can anybody confirm?
>
> Return-Path: <test at e3.emarsys.net>
> Authentication-Results: mta; dmarc=fail
> header.from=service3.zalando-lounge.de
> Authentication-Results: mta; dkim=pass
> reason="1024-bit key; unprotected key"
> header.d=service3.zalando-lounge.de
> header.i=newsletter at service3.zalando-lounge.de
> header.b=IWGb3WPX; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral
> Authentication-Results: mta;
> spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=<test at e3.emarsys.net>
> smtp.helo=pmta43117.emarsys.net
> From: Zalando-Lounge <newsletter at service3.zalando-lounge.de>
DKIM is passing and aligned, so this passes DMARC. If opendmarc claims
this fails, then the likelihood is that it's not seeing the
Authentication-Results for DKIM, or not identifying it as one that it
should trust. Is TrustedAuthservIDs set correctly?
-MSK
More information about the opendmarc-dev
mailing list