[opendmarc-dev] Is 1.0.0 ready?

Murray S. Kucherawy msk at blackops.org
Wed Oct 24 08:46:56 PDT 2012


On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> My wishlist have only low priority points:
>
> - polish the mailinglist. messages received from the listserver should 
> pass dmarc check.

SPF should be passing for DMARC mail.  That mail comes from dmarc.org 
(actually medusa.blackops.org), and there's an SPF record that includes 
"a" as a rule.  Am I missing something?

> - what is the current recomentation for aggreageted reports: is dkim 
> signing a MUST or SHOULD?
>   (your reports does not pass dkim validation)

It's SHOULD (Section 12.2.1).  Reports are generated by a perl script and 
fed directly to sendmail, which should be signing them.  I haven't traced 
down why they might be failing to verify.

-MSK


More information about the opendmarc-dev mailing list