[opendmarc-dev] Is 1.0.0 ready?
Murray S. Kucherawy
msk at blackops.org
Wed Oct 24 08:46:56 PDT 2012
On Mon, 15 Oct 2012, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> My wishlist have only low priority points:
>
> - polish the mailinglist. messages received from the listserver should
> pass dmarc check.
SPF should be passing for DMARC mail. That mail comes from dmarc.org
(actually medusa.blackops.org), and there's an SPF record that includes
"a" as a rule. Am I missing something?
> - what is the current recomentation for aggreageted reports: is dkim
> signing a MUST or SHOULD?
> (your reports does not pass dkim validation)
It's SHOULD (Section 12.2.1). Reports are generated by a perl script and
fed directly to sendmail, which should be signing them. I haven't traced
down why they might be failing to verify.
-MSK
More information about the opendmarc-dev
mailing list